Spend your time interviewing people worth interviewing. Hire Up Level screens every applicant against what your role actually requires, using questions built with you, and then hands you a short list of the most qualified candidates, pre-screened and ready to interview. Sourcing, screening, follow-up, and scheduling are ours. The hiring decision stays yours.
Illustration of the service in motion. Not client data.
The hard part starts the moment the applications arrive.
Two hundred applications for one opening means somebody is making fast calls off a résumé skim. Good people get cut for the wrong reasons, and nobody ever finds out which ones.
Anyone can generate a polished, keyword-perfect application in about ninety seconds now. You find out what somebody can actually do in a conversation, and conversations are the thing you have least of.
Most fixes hand you a new system to configure, maintain, and work through. Our team runs this one alongside the AI, so there is no new tech for you to learn.
More applicants create more screening work. They do not automatically create better candidates.
In 2025, up from 146 in 2022. The same person is now expected to get through five times the volume.
In 2025, more than double 2022. Reading all of them properly is a full week of somebody's time.
In 2025, up from 43.6 in 2022. Roles are staying open two months and longer while the pile grows.
You have a role open. Our AI screener contacts every person who applies and has a real screening conversation with each one, using the questions you told us the job actually requires.
We score those conversations and hand you a short list of people worth your time and ready for your calendar. You never learn a platform, and you decide who gets hired.
This is the work that sits between opening a role and meeting someone worth hiring. All of it is ours.
We get specific about what the role actually requires, in the hiring manager's words rather than the job description's. This is what the screen gets built from.
Applicants, passive prospects, and the people who applied three weeks ago and never heard back from anyone. We go find them and we contact them.
Every candidate answers the same role-specific questions we built with you. Not a keyword filter, and not a form. Questions someone has to actually answer.
You see how each person answered and why they scored where they did. If you disagree with a score, you can see exactly where it came from and tell us.
Reminders, reschedules, and the no-show chasing that eats an afternoon. Interviews land on your calendar without you in the email thread.
Fifteen minutes to tell us who you liked and who missed. We adjust the screening criteria from there, so the slate gets closer to exactly right.
Plenty of hiring tools will happily make the decision for you. We think the decision is the one part of this that should stay yours.
Tell us what you are hiring for. No subscription, no platform contract, no annual commitment. We scope the role with you and your hiring manager so we know what a credible candidate actually looks like.
Sourcing, outreach, screening conversations, scoring, follow-up, and scheduling. We check in each week so you can tell us who landed and who missed, and we adjust from there.
Candidates arrive with their answers and their scores attached, ready for your calendar. You spend your time evaluating them and deciding who gets hired.
I spent years running a Salesforce engineering team, which means I spent years hiring engineers.
Screening technical people was never easy. Certifications are simple to collect and tell you very little about whether someone can actually build. So you read the résumé, form a theory, and find out in the interview whether the theory held up. That was always the job.
AI didn't create that problem. It made it considerably worse.
Candidates aren't doing anything wrong. Every career coach on the internet tells them to tailor their application to the posting, and now there's a tool that does it in the time it takes to paste in the job description. They're following the advice they were given. What lands in your inbox is a stack of applications that are all technically correct, all say roughly the same thing, and leave the real work of figuring out who can do the job sitting on your desk.
The obvious fix is a better filter. I don't think that works. A filter reads the same document everyone else is reading, and that document stopped being reliable.
What tells you something is a conversation. Nobody has time for two hundred of those.
So we have those conversations for you.
Bring the role that has been open the longest and we will show you exactly what we would do with it.